Distinct objects form factual memory without becoming interchangeable.
Sources, evidence, records, actors, relationships, contexts, and dossiers play different roles. This distinction lets memory grow without turning a claim into fact, proximity into a conclusion, or synthesis into evidence.
Request a demoHow can an investigation be represented without turning everything into loose text?
Six objects.
One navigable investigation.
Sources, evidence, records, contexts, actors, and dossiers work together without becoming interchangeable.
The original material remains whole.
Documents, conversations, media, and files are inventoried, preserved, and versioned. Investigative work begins without replacing the source with an interpretation.
- Status
- Original preserved
- Version
- 1
- Fingerprint
- 7be4…c911
- Custody
- Recorded
Sources and evidence preserve what came from the material.
The source is the received object. Evidence is a located literal excerpt within it. Neither automatically establishes a conclusion.
- Immutable, versioned source
- Citable literal excerpt
- Verifiable locator
Records turn material into reviewable propositions.
Claims, events, admissions, subjective states, and hypotheses retain attribution, epistemic status, and review state.
- Attribution
- Narrated date
- Confirmation, correction, or rejection
Actors and contexts organize participation and episodes.
Mentions and aliases remain separate from confirmed identities. Contexts group elements without turning proximity into guilt or automatic relevance.
- Conservative registry
- Roles and aliases
- Reviewable contexts
A dossier is a composition over the foundation, not the foundation itself.
The same investigation can produce a factual dossier, chronology, evidence matrix, or executive report without erasing counterevidence or gaps.
- Multiple formats
- Citations for each claim
- Explicit limits